Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944

Di Bartolo v. City of New York

Di Bartolo v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 28, 1944 · Martik
267 A.D. 351; 45 N.Y.S.2d 845; 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4722

Counsel

Robert J. Keegan, Jr., of counsel (Murray Sendler with him on the brief; Ignatius M. Wilkinson, Corf oration Counsel), for appellant., Harry Fieldsteel of counsel (Rao, Liggio & Cannella, attorneys), for respondents.

Di Bartolo v. City of New York

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

There was full compliance with section 394a-l.Q of the Administrative Code of the City of New York (L. 1937, ch. 929). To the extent that the defendant relies on the stipulation of the parties to establish that the action is premature, it was incumbent on the defendant to plead that special agreement in its answer as an affirmative defense.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Dissenting Opinion

Martik, P. J.

(dissenting). This action has been prematurely instituted and the complaint should be dismissed. (Casey v. City of New York, 217 N. Y. 192; Johannes v. City of New York, 257 App. Div. 197, affd. 281 N. Y. 825; and Collins v. City of New York, 257 App. Div. 988.)

*353Townley, TTntebmyeb, Dobe and Callahan, JJ., concur in Per Curiam opinion; Mastín, P. J., dissents in memorandum.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.