In re Hoenig
In re Hoenig
268 A.D. 8; 48 N.Y.S.2d 210; 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3093
Opinion of the Court
An Official Beferee has found the respondent guilty of professional misconduct. In view of mitigating circumstances and the additional fact that the Beferee in his report stated that the respondent’s improper conduct was not caused by any desire to defraud his clients, but “ solely through carelessness and loose business methods ”, we believe a censure is sufficient punishment.
The respondent should be censured.
Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ., concur.
Respondent censured.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.