In re the Estate of Davis
Opinion of the Court
Order so far as appealed from modified in accordance with the memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: We conclude that this proceeding is under section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act. Respondent attorneys have been awarded an allowance for services and disbursements growing out of their employment by the former administratrix, Frances M. Lawson. Although, on appeal from the decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Niagara County awarding letters of administration to her, this court reversed the decree on the law and remitted the matter to the Surrogate’s Court, with directions to issue letters to the present appellant herein (sub nom. Matter of Holmes, 265 App. Div. 1033), nevertheless the closeness of the question involved is indicated by the dissent in this court and the affirmance by the Court of Appeals in a four to three decision (291 N. Y. 261), of the decision of this court. In awarding to respondents the allowance herein, from which this present appeal has been taken, the Surrogate necessarily determined that the services were beneficial to the estate as a whole, and in fixing the amount evidently considered, not only general services rendered to the former administratrix in the course of the administration of the estate, but also those
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.