Wallace v. Saltzman
Wallace v. Saltzman
270 A.D. 997; 63 N.Y.S.2d 215; 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5029
Opinion of the Court
•This is a simple employment contract and plaintiff is entitled to have his claim passed upon by a jury in accordance with his demand for jury trial and defendants may not defeat his right by claiming that each item is subject to challenge. This is a situation which should be disposed of on examination before trial. Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Callahan and Peck, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.