Friedman v. Odora Co.
Friedman v. Odora Co.
273 A.D. 755; 75 N.Y.S.2d 515; 1947 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2988
Opinion of the Court
We find that the three defenses attacked are insufficient in law. (See Pollitz V. Wabash Bailroad Go., No. 1,150 App. Div. 709; Pollitz v. Wabash Bailroad Co., No. 2, 150 App. Div. 715.) Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified by granting plaintiff’^ cross motion to dismiss said defenses and by denying examination of plaintiff before trial on item 8 in said order and as so modified affirmed, with $20 costs and dsibursements to the appellant. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.