Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947

In re Friedland

In re Friedland
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 7, 1947
271 A.D.2d 707

Counsel

Einar Chrystie for petitioner., John R. Davies for respondent.

In re Friedland

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

An official referee has reported that the charges of misconduct set forth in the petition have been established by the petitioner. He pointed out, however, that there were mitigating circumstances. Although the evidence fully sustains the charges, we agree with the official referee that there were mitigating circumstances which warrant the conclusion that a censure is sufficient punishment.

The respondent should be censured.

Martin, P. J., G-lennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Yoorhis, JJ., concur.

Respondent censured.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.