Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947

Claim of Torrence v. Ringling Bros.

Claim of Torrence v. Ringling Bros.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided September 17, 1947
272 A.D.2d 986
Claim of Torrence v. Ringling Bros.

Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal by employer and its insurance *987carrier from an award in favor of various special funds and for funeral expenses in connection with the death of Victoria Torrence. The employer was engaged in the circus and show business and the decedent and her husband worked for it. They performed together in the employer’s circus as entertainers in an aerial act. On May 6, 1945, while performing her act at Madison Square Garden, the wife fell a distance of about fifty feet and sustained accidental injuries which resulted in her death the same day. She left no person surviving entitled to compensation within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The sole issue raised on this appeal is whether the decedent was an employee or an independent contractor. The board found that she was an employee and the evidence sustains that finding. Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. All concur. [See post, p. 1083.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.