Hix v. Deegan
Hix v. Deegan
274 A.D. 769; 80 N.Y.S.2d 736; 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3263
Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements, on the authority o£ Soporito v. Hetzler Foundries, Inc. (295 N. Y. 922) and Surace v. Pfaudler Co. (295 N. Y. 923) with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days after service of the order, with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See post, p. 822.]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.