Morris v. Mezger
Morris v. Mezger
275 A.D.2d 656
Concurring Opinion
(concurring). I concur for affirmance solely on the ground that on this appeal plaintiff has restricted his claim only to recover damages by reason of defendant’s failure to issue and deliver stock to plaintiff in Mastercraft Builders, Inc.
Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan and Yan Yoorhis, JJ., concur in decision; Dore, J., concurs in result, in opinion.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. [See post, p. 709.]
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.