Garland v. Garland
Garland v. Garland
275 A.D.2d 847
Opinion of the Court
Under the circumstances here shown, counsel fee should not have been allowed. (Beadleston v. Beadleston, 103 N. Y. 402, 404; McCarthy v. McCarthy, 137 N. Y. 500; Fishman v. Fishman, 275 App. Div. 777.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.