Sondheimer v. Beck
Opinion of the Court
The motion of the plaintiff-appellant to reargue this appeal has been granted (ante, p. 1114) and upon reargument the decision of this court herein dated October 10, 1950 (ante, p. 969) is vacated. ' The motion fol’ reargument was made by plaintiff-appellant because of an error committed in her brief in which she asked that the rent for the period of occupancy be reduced to the sum of $2,250. The original decision of this court granted her that relief. She now asks that the rent be further reduced to the sum of $1,550. We concur in that request and find that there is due and payable by the plaintiff-appellant to the defendant-respondent $500 for the winter season of 1945-46 under the terms of the lease
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.