Smith v. Graham

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent on the authority of Tyler v. Windels (186 App. Div. 698, affid. 227 N. T. 589). We are not unmindful of the doctrine enunciated in Restatement of the Law of Contracts (Vol. 1, § 198, and particularly illustration 9 thereunder; N: V. Ann. to Restatement, Contracts, § 198, p. 95); see also, Williston on Contracts (Vol. 2, Rev. ed., § 504, pp. 1469-1472). Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.