Tausik v. Tausik

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. We do not rule that an examination before trial on specific issues on a showing of special circumstances will never be allowed in any matrimonial action. It is sufficient to observe that such examination will generally not be necessary and, as a matter of policy, a general examination will not be allowed. The proposed examination in this case falls within that rule. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.