Aron v. Aron
Opinion of the Court
In view of the long delay in plaintiff’s moving to punish defendant for contempt and the size of the resulting fine imposed, the order appealed from should be modified by sustaining the fine for the past due unpaid
Van Yoorhis, J., concurs in the reduction of current alimony to $125 per month but dissents from so much of the decision as affirms in part the provision of the order punishing defendant for contempt, and votes to deny the application to punish for contempt.
In first appeal: Dore, J. P., Cohn and Breitel, JJ., concur in Per Curiam, opinion; Van Yoorhis, J., concurs in part and dissents in part and votes to deny the application to punish for contempt.
Order unanimously modified in accordance with the opinion herein.
In second appeal: Dore, J. P., Cohn, Van Yoorhis and Breitel, JJ., concur.
Order unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Settle order on notice.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.