Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953

In re Sussman

In re Sussman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 24, 1953
281 A.D. 246; 119 N.Y.S.2d 240; 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3021

Counsel

Frank H. Gordon for petitioner., No appearance on behalf of respondent.

In re Sussman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The respondent, an attorney and counselor at law, is charged with (1) converting to his own use the sum of $1,000 received by him on behalf of a client; (2) neglect of a matrimonial matter and false report to a client, including an assurance that he had obtained for him a divorce decree when, in fact, the case had been adjourned without date for failure to offer competent evidence; and (3) failing to perform services for which he had been paid. The $1,000 was restored after complaint had been made to petitioner Bar Association.

*247Respondent filed an answer denying any information sufficient to form a belief. Thereafter he defaulted in appearance before the Referee, although served with a notice of hearing. Respondent’s failure to appearwhile lawful, was accompanied by an unlawful failure to produce subpoenaed documents or to furnish excuse for their nonproduction.

Respondent should be disbarred.

Peck, P. J., Callahan, Van Voorhis and Breitel, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.