Finkel v. Lozea
Finkel v. Lozea
281 A.D. 810; 118 N.Y.S.2d 756; 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3363
Opinion of the Court
On defendant’s motion to strike allegations, plaintiffs’ counsel, on argument, consented to have stricken the words “ and still is ” from paragraph third of the amended complaint. The word “ arbitrarily ” in paragraph seventh is directed to be stricken. Accordingly, on defendant’s appeal, the order is unanimously modified to strike out the above-quoted words, and, as so modified, affirmed. On plaintiffs’ appeal, the order is unanimously affirmed in all respects, with $20 costs and disbursements to the defendant-respondent. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Van Yoorhis and Breitel, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.