Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954

Farewell v. Milbank

Farewell v. Milbank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 18, 1954
284 A.D. 898; 134 N.Y.S.2d 318; 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3995
Farewell v. Milbank

Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and for expenses and loss of services, order granting plaintiffs’ motion for a preference in the trial of the action reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. There was no sufficient showing warranting the exercise of discretion in favor of granting the preference. (Of. Quinlan v. Schaefer Brewing Go., 279 App. Div. 805; O’Callaghan v. Brawley, 276 App. Div. 908; Braver V. Davis, 277 App. Div. 879; Pitrello v. Garro, 278 App. Div. 770, and Svei v. Minch Bros., 279 App. Div. 597.) The authorities relied on by plaintiffs (Belcher v. Erie B. B. Co., 280 App. Div. 796; Bernstein v. Strammiello, 202 Mise. 823) are readily distinguishable. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.