Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955

People v. Dosztan

People v. Dosztan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 18, 1955
286 A.D. 1151; 146 N.Y.S.2d 17; 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5469
People v. Dosztan

Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: The records before us, including the record of conviction, do not reveal that defendant was ever informed of his rights to have counsel, as required by the mandatory provisions of sections 188 and 308 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. However, the “County Court Minutes,” apparently written up by a stenographer, contain the statement “Defendant present with attorney Joseph W. Singer, as counsel.” In view of defendant’s positive denial that he was represented by this lawyer, or any other lawyer, we feel that the conflicting records (all duly certified) in this respect are inconclusive. He was, therefore, entitled to a hearing. (People v. Richetti, 302 N. Y. 290; People v. Guariglia, 303 N. Y. 338.) All concur. (Appeal from an order of Lewis County Court denying defendant’s application for an order granting a hearing and for the issuance of a writ of error coram nobis vacating a judgment of conviction.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.