Fetsch v. Village of Sands Point
Opinion of the Court
Appeal (1) from an order denying appellants’ cross motion to dismiss the amended complaint for insufficiency, or for other relief, and (2) from another order granting respondents’ motion for a temporary injunction restraining condemnation of part of respondents’ property. Orders affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. The first cause of action sufficiently alleges a cause of action for prima facie tort. The allegation that appellants’ acts caused respondents to incur legal expenses is an allegation of temporal damage. The second cause of action sufficiently alleges a cause of action to enjoin the condemnation in that it is claimed that the purpose of the condemnation was primarily private and only incidentally public. (Denihan Enterprises v. O’Dwyer, 302 N. Y. 451.) Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Ughetta, J., dissents and votes to modify
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.