Berkley v. Korcad Corp.

Order denying defendant’s motion to vacate a warrant of attachment or in the alternative to increase the plaintiff’s bond unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. Defendant’s motion to vacate the warrant of attachment did not constitute a general appearance in the circumstances of this case. (Zabriskie v. Second Nat. Bank, 204 App. Div. 428, 430.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Bréitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.