Paparo v. State
Paparo v. State
9 A.D.2d 724; 192 N.Y.S.2d 349
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs to the claimants-respondents. Memorandum: Under the circumstances the demand of the Attorney-General that the claimants deliver a release from Daniel G. Robbino was unreasonable and arbitrary. See memorandum filed in D’Agostino v. State of New York (9 A D 2d 724), All concur. (Cross appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims for claimants on a claim for appropriation of realty by State.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Kimball, Williams, Bastow and Halpern, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.