Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961

Pacific Insurance v. Hodgkinson

Pacific Insurance v. Hodgkinson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 19, 1961
14 A.D.2d 752; 220 N.Y.S.2d 449; 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8438
Pacific Insurance v. Hodgkinson

Opinion of the Court

The complaint violates the provisions of section 241 of the Civil Practice Act in failing to contain a plain and concise statement of the material facts. Instead it contains a detailed recital of the evidentiary facts upon which, presumably, plaintiff intends to rely. Moreover, the complaint in alleging in its twenty-third paragraph that plaintiff denies liability under its policy upon grounds, “ among others ”, that defendant Paul Hodgkinson was not a resident of the household of the named insured fails to tender an issue which would be determinative of the liabilities between the parties. This does not satisfy the requirements in an action for declaratory judgment (Smith v. Western Union Tel. Co., 276 App. Div. 210, 213, affd. 302 N. Y. 683). Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.