Dhooge Bros. v. Mecho
Dhooge Bros. v. Mecho
15 A.D.2d 774; 224 N.Y.S.2d 745; 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11209
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff has failed to set forth sufficient facts establishing misrepresentation or fraud on the part of the moving defendant who was not a party to the contract. “ Fraud cannot be inferred, it must be proved.” (Anderson v. Malley, 191 App. Div. 573, 575.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.