Pochari v. County of Westchester
Pochari v. County of Westchester
15 A.D.2d 823; 225 N.Y.S.2d 229; 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11270
Opinion of the Court
In our opinion the complaint and Trumid’s cross complaint against Gamewell alleges active and passive negligence and, therefore, impleader is proper. A cross complaint or a third-party complaint is deemed sufficient on the pleadings if there is any possibility of liability over against a third party (Putvin v. Buffalo Elec. Co., 5 N Y 2d 447; Marzella v. Carlson Hoist & Mach. Co., 280 App. Div. 955; Robinson v. Binghamton Constr. Co., 277 App. Div. 468; Schoenfeld v. Four Leaf Clover Realty Corp., 273 App. Div. 824). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.