Claim of Wooster v. Spector Mid States Freight System
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the employer and its carrier from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Decedent, a truck driver, suffered a fatal heart attack after he had lifted 16 rolls of plastic quilting each 4 feet long and 18 inches in diameter and weighing 55 to 60 pounds from a fork lift and stacked them in his truck. This activity took place in a 15-minute period while the temperature was approximately 20 degrees. An autopsy listed the cause of death as acute coronary thrombosis and coronary sclerosis. Appellants while acknowledging that the exertion involved would be sufficient to support an award urge that the record contains no substantial evidence to support the board's determination that the work involved precipitated the thrombosis. We cannot agree. As is typical in such cases both claimant and appellants produced experts who, based solely on the autopsy report since neither expert had ever seen the decedent and no previous history was available, gave conflicting medical opinions on whether decedent’s activities precipitated the thrombosis. The resolution of such conflicting opinions is a factual determination for the board and outside the province of this court (Matter of Palermo v. Gallucci & Sons, 5 N Y 2d 529). We find no merit in appellants’ contention that Dr. Wally, claimant’s expert, took a contradictory position on
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.