In re the Estate of Hulbert
Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding by the trustee of the trusts for Carolyn H. Bassett, now deceased, under paragraph Fifty-fourth of the will and codicils of Henry C. Hulbert, for the settlement of the trustee’s account and for a judicial construction of said paragraph of the will insofar as it relates to a so-called third trust which provided that the trustee was to pay the income thereof, after the death of the testator’s daughter Carolyn, to her third or other child besides her two natural born children, if any such child should be living at the time of his death, etc., Carolyn’s two natural born children, Elizabeth B. Sexton (formerly Holt and Hulbert D. Bassett (individually and as an executor of Carolyn) appeal from so much of the decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated July 14, 1961, as construed the will to the effect that the third trust created for Carotyn II. Bassett by said paragraph Fifty-fourth is to continue during the lifetime of Anne Walker, the adopted daughter of Carolyn TI. Bassett, and that the net income of said trust is to be paid over to Anne Walker during her lifetime. Decree modified on the law and the facts, by striking therefrom the third decretal paragraph and by substituting therefor a provision directing that the principal of said trust is to be paid over to the appellants in equal shares. As so modified, decree, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs to all parties filing separate briefs, payable out of the said third trust, and matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court for the entry of a decree not inconsistent herewith. Findings of fact inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. The testator’s will was executed in 1907. Four codicils were made between that date and June, 1910, and he died in 1912. He was survived by two daughters, Susan and Carolyn; by three children of Susan, and by two children (the appellants) of Carolyn. In 1920, Carolyn adopted Anne Walker, who was then 18 years of age. Anne Walker has presented no claim that she is the third or other child referred to in the testator’s will and has declared that it does not seem to her that she had a legal or ethical right to any part of his estate. Inter alia, in paragraph Fifty-fourth of his will, the testator gave $1,700,000 in trust to a trustee to be divided into 1,700 equal parts. The trustee was directed to pay the income of 133 1/3 parts to Susan during her lifetime and, after her death, to pay the income thereof to Josephine, one of Susan’s daughters and, after her death, to pay the principal to such person or persons as Josephine may direct or appoint in her last will and, such appointment failing, to pay over the principal sum to the heirs of Josephine. Two trusts, each involving 133 1/3 parts, were established which were identical with the trust described heretofore, except that one of the other children of Susan was named therein respectively in place of Josephine. Two trusts, each of 133 1/3 parts, were established which were identical with the first trust described herein, except that Carolyn was the daughter of the testator named therein and one of Carolyn’s children was named respectively therein in place of a child of Susan. In the so-called third trust, the trust in issue herein, the trustee was directed to pay over the income of 133 1/3 parts to Carolyn “ during her natural life, and after her death to pay over the income thereof to her third or other child besides said Hulbert D.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.