Holst v. Abbate
Holst v. Abbate
25 A.D.2d 577; 267 N.Y.S.2d 495; 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5012
Opinion of the Court
We find involved only issues of fact and credibility which the board could properly resolve as it did and which are not subject to our review since the board’s determinations are supported by substantial evidence (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 23). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.