De Lang v. Doctors Hospital
De Lang v. Doctors Hospital
29 A.D.2d 735; 287 N.Y.S.2d 366; 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4841
Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In the light of the concessions contained in the respondent’s brief, we construe the amended bill of particulars as sufficiently limiting the generalities contained in the original bill of particulars. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term denying motion for an order of preclusion or a further bill of particulars.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Del Vecchio, Witmer and Henry, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.