Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969

Bottalico v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad

Bottalico v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 11, 1969
33 A.D.2d 756; 305 N.Y.S.2d 1021; 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2581
Bottalico v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad

Opinion of the Court

Order entered May 20, 1969, denying defendant’s motion for a protective order, unanimously modified on the facts and the law, without costs or disbursements, to provide that the examination of defendant’s employees shall be in Jacksonville, Florida, and, at the election of plaintiffs, shall be by written interrogatories or open commission. If plaintiffs elect to examine by open commission, the parties shall pay their respective expenses, which shall be taxed as costs by the prevailing party. Otherwise the order is affirmed. The requirement that witnesses travel a thousand miles is onerous and likely unnecessary. If the witnesses should come to New York for the trial or for any reason prior thereto, plaintiffs shall be advised beforehand and accorded the opportunity of conducting the examination directed. (See Pakter v. Lilly & Co., 19 A D 2d 810; Piel v. Lilly & Co., 19 A D 2d 810; Winds v. Hydropress, 279 App. Div. 1005.) Defendant’s brief offers to submit the witnesses for examination in New York City about one week before trial. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, Tilzer, Markewich and McNally, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.