Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970

Saccente v. Toterhi

Saccente v. Toterhi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 1, 1970
35 A.D.2d 692; 314 N.Y.S.2d 593; 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3833
Saccente v. Toterhi

Opinion of the Court

Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., Nunez and Tilzer, JJ.; Markewich and McNally, JJ., dissent in the following memorandum by McNally, J.: I would deny the discovery. The photographs of the plaintiff in question were taken by a representative of the defendants’ insurance carrier a short time after the accident. Plaintiffs in tort actions are not entitled to obtain the product of investigations on accidents by automobile liability insurers in preparation for the handling of 1 claims against their insureds. No special circumstances are alleged. There is no showing of prejudice. Plaintiff could have obtained photographs himself if he so desired and may testify as to his appearance and condition at any time after the occurrence as well as at the time the photographs were taken. (Kandel v. Tocher, 22 A D 2d 513.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.