State Divivion of Human Rights v. McGinnis
Opinion of the Court
Order of enforcement granted, without costs. All concur, except Witmer and Henry, JJ., who dissent and vote to dismiss the petition, in the following memorandum: In this special proceeding brought pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law petitioner prays for an order enforcing a provision of a Division order which directed respondent to pay compensatory damages of $500 to complainant. We have jurisdiction of the proceeding and are empowered to enforce, modify and enforce as modified, or set aside the order of the Commissioner (Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v. Lupino, 35 A D 2d 107, 108; Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v. Employers-Commercial Union Ins. Group, 33 A D 2d 273, 276). Although the Commissioner properly concluded that McGinnis committed an unlawful discriminatory practice in refusing to rent an apartment to complainant, there is no evidence to support his finding that as a consequence thereof complainant became aggrieved, suffered humiliation and mental anguish and was thereby damaged. Complainant did
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.