Erdman v. Hartung
Erdman v. Hartung
41 A.D.2d 1015; 344 N.Y.S.2d 829; 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4436
Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion at Special Term. We also note that defendant has failed to set forth any fact in support of his assertion that he has a defense to the account. (Accord Farmers Coop. v. Levine, 36 A D 2d 656; Beck v. Greinert, 29 A D 2d 712.) (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Special Term in action for breach of contract.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Witmer, Moule and Cardamone, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.