Lacorazza v. State Liquor Authority
Opinion of the Court
Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to annul respondent’s determination, dated March 21, 1973, (1) suspending petitioner’s liquor license for on-premises consumption for a deferred period of 15 days and (2) imposing a $1,000 claim upon petitioner’s bond. Proceeding dismissed on the merits and determination confirmed, without costs. We agree with petitioner that the constitutional protection against illegal search and seizure is applicable to administrative poreeedings conducted by respondent (Matter of Finn’s Liq. Shop v. State Liq. Auth., 24 N Y 2d 647, 654, cert. den. 396 U. S. 840). But, in our opinion, Firm’s IAq. Shop is distinguishable in material respects from the situation at bar. In Finn’s IAq. Shop the majority opinion questioned the right of the State Liquor Authority to inspect the licensed premises because the license in that case was for the sale of packaged liquors for off-premises consumption. Here, the Authority unquestionably had the right to send representatives to inspect the licensed premises for a complaint of violation of subdivision 2 of section 106 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, since the license was for the sale of
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.