In re Zapata
Opinion of the Court
By our order of December 30, 1974 (46 A D 2d 333), both respondents were directed to be suspended from the practice of law for the period of one year. The charges were neglect of professional duty in respect of a case in which retained, and obstruction of an official inquiry by the offer of money to a complainant. Respondents have moved for reconsideration on the basis of additional papers, as well as submissions by amici curiae. We have examined these materials and have reconsidered, and the motion is granted to the extent hereinafter set forth.
We found erroneously that respondent Halbert was involved in both charges. As is commendably conceded by petitioner,
Markewich, J. P., Lupiano, Tilzeb and Capozzoli, JJ,, concur,
Motion granted and, upon reargument, order of this court . entered On December 30, 1974, is. modified - insofar, as to reduce the suspension of respondents from practice as attorneys and . counselors at law in the Staté~of New York to a period of three; (3) months eaph, effectiveMay 30,1975/ -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.