In re Harrison
Opinion of the Court
The respondent was admitted to the Bar on November 5, 1945 at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Department. The petition
In our opinion, the charge was fully sustained by the evidence. Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion to confirm the report is granted.
In determining the appropriate disciplinary action to be taken, we have considered the respondent’s 30-year unblemished record as a member of the Bar, his candor and cooperation during these proceedings, the fact that he is in the process of paying his back taxes and the fact that he has already suffered the consequences attendant upon his criminal conviction.
Under all the circumstances, we deem the appropriate sanction to be imposed upon the respondent to be a censure.
Accordingly, he is hereby censured for his misconduct.
Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.