Makoske v. Lombardy

Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: "Did Special Term err as a matter of law in denying the motion of the third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint?” Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Main, JJ., concur.