Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976

Handley v. Mirro Aluminum Co.

Handley v. Mirro Aluminum Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 14, 1976
52 A.D.2d 1028
Handley v. Mirro Aluminum Co.

Opinion of the Court

*1030Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Despite the delay in seeking to amend the complaint, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in granting the application. Plaintiff states a reasonable ground for the amendment. In the amended complaint the same basic facts are alleged as are contained in the original complaint, and defendant does not show that it will be prejudiced thereby. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court —amend complaint.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Mahoney, Dillon and Witmer, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.