In re Pfingst
Opinion of the Court
The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on November 19, 1947. In this proceeding to discipline him for professional misconduct, the respondent moves to disaffirm and the petitioner cross-moves to confirm the report of the Justice of the Supreme Court to whom the issues were referred for hearing and report.
The reporting Justice found the respondent guilty of the charges of "illegal, corrupt and unethical practices and of professional misconduct and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice in his office as an attorney and counselor at law.” The charges stem from the respondent’s conviction on
After reviewing all of the evidence and the report of Mr. Justice Castaldi, we are in full accord with the findings contained in the report. Accordingly, the respondent’s motion to disaffirm the report is denied and the petitioner’s cross motion to confirm the report is granted.
The respondent is adjudged guilty of serious professional misconduct and should be and he hereby is disbarred from further practice of law and his name is ordered removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law, effective forthwith.
Gulotta, P.J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.