In re Gordon
Opinion of the Court
The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on December 20, 1950. By order of this court dated June 16, 1969, respondent was suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year, effective September 1, 1969. In this proceeding to discipline him for professional misconduct, the petitioner moves to confirm in part and disaffirm in part the report of the Justice of the Supreme Court to whom the issues were referred for hearing and report.
The reporting Justice sustained, inter alia, the following charges of professional misconduct alleged against respondent:
After reviewing all of the evidence, we are in accord with the findings of the Referee. Accordingly, that branch of petitioner’s motion which seeks confirmation in part of the Referee’s report is granted and the branch of the motion which seeks disaffirmance in part of the Referee’s report is denied.
The respondent is adjudged guilty of serious professional misconduct and should be, and he hereby is, disbarred from further practice of law and his name is ordered removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law, effective forthwith.
Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Mollen, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.