Berman v. Venturini
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Skinner v. Nelson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Skinner v. Nelson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Henry v. Trotto (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Hosley v. Curry (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- Miller v. Boyland (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- Pitts v. Black (District Court, S.D. New York 1984)
- Gregory v. Board of Elections (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Sandhu v. Sandhu (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Ferguson v. McNab (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Green v. McNab (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Thomas v. Simon (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding, inter alia, to invalidate the petition designating certain of the respondents as candidates in the Republican Party primary election to be held on September 12, 1978 for the party office of County Committeeman from the 45th Assembly District, certain of the respondents appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 21, 1978, as, inter alia, declared the designating petition invalid as to them, and the petitioners cross-appeal from so much of the same judgment as, inter alia, declared the designating petition valid as to certain of the respondents. Judgment modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the provisions which, in effect, held that the designating petition is valid as to certain of the respondents and substituting therefor a provision that the designating petition is invalid as to all of the respondent candidates. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The entire designating petition should have been invalidated because a number of the candidates’ names were placed on the petition without their consent (see Richardson v Luizzo, 64 AD2d 942). Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Shapiro and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.