Susan W. v. Amhad Q.
Cases that cite this one
23 later published cases cite this decision.
- Kordek v. Wood (NYC Family Court 1981)
- Hoke v. Ronald Z. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
- Anne R. v. Estate of Francis C. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1996)
- Shirley R. v. Ricardo B. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- Bernadette C. v. Jossival St. V. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- Harstein v. Mike S. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- Ferguson v. Gonyou (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- Bradley W. v. Mary Ann N. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- Jane PP. v. Paul QQ. (N.Y. 1984)
- Patten v. Nagy (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- Jane PP. v. Paul QQ. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- Lynch v. Repetti (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Commissioner of Social Services v. Philip De G. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Karen K. v. Christopher D. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
- Commissioner of Social Services v. Simons (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
- Karen K. v. Christopher D. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
- Kordek v. Wood (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
- Carmen V. v. Bruce R. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1981)
- Department of Social Services v. Hector S. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1981)
- Nancy V. v. Raymond E. C. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1980)
- Katherine S. v. Jerry S. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1979)
- Gardner v. Roddy (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1979)
- Gardner v. Roddy (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1979)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In a paternity proceeding, the appeals are from (1) an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated June 28, 1977, which, after a hearing, adjudged appellant to be the father of the petitioner’s child and (2) an order of the same court, entered November 15,1977, which directed the appellant to pay $20 per week for the support of the child. Appeal from order dated June 28, 1977 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. That is not an order of disposition (Family Ct Act, § 1112) and is reviewed on the appeal from the order entered November 15, 1977. Order entered November 15, 1977 affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Appellant admitted having sexual relations with petitioner over at least a four-month period, but he denied having sexual intercourse with petitioner during the time critical to conception. There was no probative evidence of any other men in petitioner’s life during the year preceding the infant’s birth. Where the determination rests basically on a resolution of credibility the finding of the Trial Judge, sitting without a jury, is accorded great weight (see, e.g., Stenzel v D’Agostino, 50 AD2d 1066; Matter of Renee K. v Robert P., 50 AD2d 604). The evidence, primarily petitioner’s testimony, was sufficient to constitute clear, convincing and entirely satisfactory proof of paternity. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Rabin and Margett, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.