In re Roseman
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Respondent was admitted to the Bar in the First Department on April 2, 1951.
He concedes that, pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, he cannot practice law in this State. However, he contends that because incarceration was stayed pending an appeal, the entry of the order striking the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys, should also be stayed pending the appeal.
The petitioner Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department seeks to have respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys. The petition should be granted. (Matter of Donegan, 282 NY 285; Matter of Ginsberg, 1 NY2d 144; Matter of Mitchell, 40 NY2d 153.)
Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Lane, Markewich and Ross, JJ., concur.
Respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.