Urbanski v. Blum
Urbanski v. Blum
75 A.D.2d 1023
Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs (see Matter of Sehimmel v Reed, 50 AD2d 1085, affd 40 NY2d 887; Matter of Barton v Lavine, 54 AD2d 350). (Appeals from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court— CPLR art 78.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan
Opinion of the Court
and Moule, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.