Yiotis v. D'Elia
Opinion of the Court
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of the State Commissioner of Social Services, dated December 2, 1977, as, after a de novo fair hearing, affirmed that part of a determination of the local agency which denied reimbursement to petitioner’s daughters for moneys expended for necessary nursing home care for petitioner. Petition granted, determination annulled insofar as reviewed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and respondents are directed to reimburse petitioner’s daughters the sum of $4,200. The record shows that petitioner presented sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption that the $4,200 in assets she transferred within a year of her initial application for medical assistance in July of 1975 was for the purpose of qualifying for medical assistance. (See Social Services Law, § 366, subd 1, par [e]; 18 NYCRR 360.8.) The presumption is an easily rebuttable one (Matter of Gardner v Lavine, 56 AD2d 930). The testimony of petitioner’s daughter established that the transfers were for other valid reasons and were founded on fair consideration. Furthermore, petitioner’s physician’s testimony indicated that she had no reason to believe that she was in imminent need of extensive medical assistance or nursing home care at the time of the transfers. The evidence thus rebuts the statutory presumption, and the record is devoid of proof to support the
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.