Loeb v. Teitelbaum
Cases that cite this one
33 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Cox v. Williams (Mich. Ct. App. 1999)
- Peterson v. County of Nassau (District Court, E.D. New York 1998)
- Gallagher v. State (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1997)
- Ward v. Silverberg (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- Papa v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- Wynne v. Rosen (Mass. 1984)
- Putnam v. County of Steuben (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Hernandez v. City of Rochester (District Court, W.D. New York 2003)
- Britton v. Maloney (1st Cir. 1999)
- Smith-Hunter v. Harvey (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
- Smith-Hunter v. Harvey (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
- Hansel v. Sheridan (District Court, N.D. New York 1998)
- Kurschus v. PaineWebber, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1998)
- Murphy v. Lynn (2d Cir. 1997)
- Britton v. Maloney (District Court, D. Massachusetts 1997)
- Murphy v. Lynn (2d Cir. 1997)
- James A. Russell v. James Smith and City of New York (2d Cir. 1995)
- Hankins v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- Buccieri v. Franzreb (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- Parkin v. Cornell University, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- Musto v. Arakel (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- Witcher v. Children's Television Workshop (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- Vitellaro v. Eagle Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- Von Bulow Ex Rel. Auersperg v. Von Bulow (District Court, S.D. New York 1987)
- Stanton v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Motion by appellants-respondents for reargument of the appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 12, 1979, which was decided by order of this court, dated October 22, 1980. Motion denied. On the court’s own motion, its decision dated October 22, 1980 [77 AD2d 92] is amended by adding a provision to its first decretal paragraph, further modifying the order appealed from, by deleting from the third decretal paragraph thereof, the words “on all issues”, and by inserting
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.