People v. Green
Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed, on the law, and counts reinstated. Memorandum: The People appeal from an order dismissing two counts of an indictment charging the defendant with attempted rape in the first degree (Penal Law, §§ 110.00, 130.35) and sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law, § 130.65) on the ground that there was insufficient evidence to support those counts. A Grand Jury indictment is presumptively valid (People v Waterman, 9 NY2d 561, 565; People v Rallo, 46 AD2d 518, 527, affd 39 NY2d 217) and should not be dismissed absent a clear showing by the defendant that the evidence before the Grand Jury, even if unexplained or uncontradicted, would not warrant conviction by a trial jury (People v Sacco, 64 AD2d 324, 327; People v Gallucci, 62 AD2d 1129, 1130). In reviewing an order dismissing an indictment for insufficiency, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the People (People v Warner-Lambert Co., 51 NY2d 295; People v Sacco, supra, p 327). Application of those principles to the facts before us requires reinstatement of the
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.