In re Rosenstein
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
The respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, on November 30,1960.
In this proceeding respondent was charged with professional misconduct in that on July 7, 1978 he was convicted in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, of violating subdivision 2 of section 374 of the Social Services Law, a misdemeanor. He was sentenced to pay a fine of $750.
The Referee found that the charge was sustained by the evidence. The petitioner has moved to confirm the report of the Referee and the respondent has submitted an affirmation in connection therewith.
After reviewing all of the evidence, we are in full agree
In determining an appropriate measure of discipline to be imposed, we are mindful of the respondent’s previously unblemished record as well as the factors in mitigation. Accordingly, the respondent should be, and he hereby is, censured for his misconduct.
Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Titone and Lazer. JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.