Abrams v. Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Rahming v. Jewish Hospital & Medical Center (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- Eisenstein v. Gill (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In a medical malpractice action, defendant Richard Allen Lipton appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Oppido, J.), dated March 4,1981, as excused plaintiffs from responding to Item No. 2 in the demand for a bill of particulars. Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the bill of particulars is to be served as to all items. Plaintiffs’ time to serve the bill of particulars is extended until 30 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made herein, together with notice of entry. Item No. 2 of appellant’s demand for a bill of particulars read as follows: “2. Give a statement of each and every act of omission, or commission, which you will claim is the basis of the alleged malpractice or other wrong doing of this answering d'efendant.” This was a proper demand in accordance with our decision in Horowitz v Saydjari (49 AD2d 760). The demand may be answered with a “[gleneral statement of the acts or omissions constituting the negligence claimed” (CPLR 3043, subd [a], par [3]; see Cirelli v Victory Mem. Hosp., 45 AD2d 856). Damiani, J.P., Lazer, Gulotta and Bracken, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.