People v. Roman
Cases that cite this one
21 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Diaz (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Jackson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- People v. Chan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
- People v. Tritto (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- People v. Miles (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- People v. Basnight (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- People v. Haimson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- People v. Rand (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- People v. Amey (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- People v. Scotti (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- People v. Consiglio (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- People v. Griffin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- People v. Golpe (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- People v. Guevara (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- People v. Tullies (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- People v. Floyd (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- People v. Arogundy (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- People v. Schettino (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- People v. Richardson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- People v. Blunk (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
- People v. Colon (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Tsoucalas, J.), rendered January 6, 1981, convicting him of attempted rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. Upon this record it has not been established that a promise was made by the court, at the time defendant’s guilty plea was accepted, with respect to the length of the sentence to be imposed. Although the court noted that the prosecutor had recommended a lesser sentence, the record is manifestly clear that the court explained to the defendant at the plea taking that no promise concerning sentence was being made and specifically stated that the recommendation would be followed only “[i]f your probation report shows that you *** deserve a break”. Concerning the sentence imposed, this court will not interfere with the discretion of the sentencing court in the absence of extraordinary circumstances (People v Notey, 72 AD2d 279). We find no such circumstances in the present case, and, therefore, the sentence should not be disturbed. Defendant’s remaining arguments have been considered and found to be without merit. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Lazer and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.