Di Biase v. Piscitelli
Opinion of the Court
— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, the New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. (NYSARC) appeals from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Young, J.), dated July 28, 1980, as dismissed its cross claims against respondents New York State Commissioners of the Office of Mental Health (OMH) and of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities (OMRDD). Judgment and order modified, on the law, by deleting the provision dismissing the aforesaid cross claims and by adding a provision thereto declaring that section 41.34 of the Mental Hygiene Law is constitutional as herein applied. As so modified, order and judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Within the instant article 78 proceeding, NYSARC cross-claimed against the Commissioners of OMH and OMRDD for a judgment declaring section 41.34 of the Mental Hygiene Law to be unconstitutional. In its amended pleading, NYSARC claimed that section 41.34 is unconstitutional because it allegedly violates certain due process and equal protection rights of the mentally ill and retarded, and of the developmentally disabled, e.g., the right to purchase and occupy residential property. We find that, on its face and
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.